Christopher W. Tindale, The Importance of Rhetoric for Argumentation

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS

2. Sally Jackson, Disputation by Design

PAPERS AND COMMENTARIES

1. Andrew Aberdein, Persuasive Definition
Bruce Russell, Comments on Aberdein

2. Jonathan Adler, Arguing from Ignorance
Dale Jacquette, Ignorance is No Excuse (For Deductively Invalid Inference): Reply to Adler

3. Derek Allen, Should We Assess the Basic Premises of an Argument for Truth or
Acceptability? Ralph H. Johnson, Commentary on Allen

4. Jeremy Bailenson & Lance J. Rips, Claim Strength and Burden of Proof
Stuart M. Keeley, Commentary on Bailenson and Rips

5. J. Anthony Blair, The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument
E.C.W. Krabbe, Comment on J. Anthony Blair

6. George Boger, Aristotle's Treatment of Fallacious Reasoning in Sophistical
Refutations and Prior Analytics
David Hitchcock, Comments on George Boger

7. Leah Bradshaw, Emotions, Reasons and Judgment

8. M. Neil Browne, Terri J. Keeley, and W. J. Hiers, The Rhetorical Burden of Expert Witnesses
Derek Allen, Comments on Browne, Keeley and Hiers

9. M. Neil Browne and R. G. Hausmann, Argument as an Act of Friendship
Herbert Simons, A Response to Browne and Hausmann

10. Patrick Clauss, Eunoia on the Internet?: Usenet Newsgroups and the Subversion
of Rationality
Jim Gough, Response to Patrick Clauss

11. Dan Cohen, The Argument Against Rhetoric
Michael Leff, Argument and Interpretive Performance: A Response to Cohen

12. Inga Dolinina and Vikki Cecchetto Facework and Rhetorical Strategies in
Intercultural Argumentative Discourse

13. Michael G Dzialo,. Legal and Philosophical Fictions: At the Line Where the Two
Become One
Christopher W. Tindale, Comments on Michael Dzialo

14. James G. Edwards, Pathological Circularity: Deductive Validity and a Contextual Account of the Fallacy of Begging the Question
Lawrence H. Powers, Question Begging and Circularity: A Response to Edwards

15. Maged El Komos, Perelman as Educational Facilitator: the Realm of Rhetoric
and the Acquisition of Rational Discourse
Claude Gratton, Response to El Komos

16. Eveline T. Feteris, The Soundness of Pragmatic Argumentation: Does the End
Justify the Means?
Leo Groarke, Feteris on 'Instrumental' Argumentation

17. Linda Fisher, Is Reasoning Gendered?
Jacqueline MacGregor Davies, A Commentary on Fisher: Beyond the Bog

18. David Fleming, Housing Rhetoric: Argumentation and City Planning
Ernest Sternberg, Comments on David Fleming

19. James B. Freeman, What Types of Statements are There? A Philosophical Look at Stasis Theory
Marie Secor, Response to Freeman

20. Michael A. Gilbert, Prolegomenon to a Pragmatics of Emotion

21. Rod Girle, Belief Sets and Commitment Stores
John Woods, Comments on Girle

22. Jean Goodwin, Forms of Authority and the Real Argumentum ad Verecundiam
Hanns Hohmann, Argumentative Dimensions of Legitimate Authority

23. Jill Gordon, Why Didn't Plato Just Write Arguments? The Role of Image-Making in the Dialogues
Robert J. Yanal, Response to Jill Gordon

24. Matthew Gorman, Does Socrates Engage in Socratic Argumentation?

25. Trudy Govier, Arguing Forever? Or: Two Tiers of Argument Appraisal
Ralph H. Johnson, Response to Govier

26. Claude Gratton, Infinite Regress of Recurring Questions and Answers
Joseph A. Novak, Comments on Claude Gratton

27. Albert W. Halsall, The Topics in Classical and Modern Theories of Interpretation
Hanns Hohmann, Argumentative Topics and the Rhetoric of Literature

28. Calvin Hayes, Popper's Critical Rationalism and the Rationale for
Pragma-Dialectics
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Comments on Hayes

29. Darrin Hicks, Subjectivity and Governance in Procedural Theories of Argument
Eveline Feteris, Comments on Darrin Hicks

30. David Hitchcock, Enumerative Induction
Rod Girle, Comments on Hitchcock

31. William Hughes, Why Ethics Should be on the Critical Thinking Syllabus
William Abbott, Hughes on Ethics and Critical Thinking

32. Dale Jacquette, On the Relation of Informal to Formal Logic
Hans V. Hansen, Reply to Dale Jacquette

33. Ralph H. Johnson, Differences Between Argumentative and Rhetorical Space
Joseph Wenzel, The Rhetoric of Argumentation: A Rejoinder

34. Fred Kauffeld, Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in
Acts of Proposing and Accusing
James B. Freeman, Comments on Fred Kauffeld

35. Harm Kloosterhuis, The Reconstruction of Legal Analogy-Argumentation:
Monological and Dialogical Approaches
Jerome Bickenbach, Comments on Kloosterhuis

36. Robert A. Kominar, Rhetoric or Argument: The Rational Culture of ADR
Jerome Bickenbach, Comments on Kominar

37. Erik C. W. Krabbe, Who is Afraid of Figure of Speech?
John Hoaglund, Comments on Krabbe and the Fallacy of Figure of Speech

38. Ingrid Makus, Feminist Reasoning About Reason
Carmel M. Forde, Comments on Makus

39. Gwen C. Mathewson, Outdoing Lewis Carrol: Judicial Rhetoric and Acceptable
Fictions
Jacqueline MacGregor Davies, Taking Stories Seriously: Comments on Mathewson

40. William Mathie, Rhetoric and Reason in the Civil Science of Thomas Hobbes
Philippe Azzie, Comments on William Mathie

41. Connie Missimer, Do the Fallacies you Favor Retard the Growth of Knowledge?
Christina Slade, Comments on Connie Missimer

42. Terri Palmer, The Dictates of Reason: Bacon, Ramus, and the Naturalization of
Invention
Corrado Federici, Response to Terri Palmer

43. Robert C. Pinto, Logic, Coherence and Psychology
Jonathan Adler, Comments on Pinto

44. José Plug, Indicators of Obiter Dicta
David Godden, Comments on José Plug

45. Lawrence H. Powers, Ad Hominem Arguments
John Woods, Comments on Lawrence Powers

46. Chris Reed and Derek Long, Persuasion Monologue
Mark Vorobej, What Exactly is a Persuasive Monologue?

47. William Rehg, Argumentation Theory and the Recent Philosophy of Science
Marcello Guarini, A Commentary on Relativism, Underdetermination, and William
Rehg's Research Directions Model of Scientific Rationality

48. Marco Rühl, Argument and Authority: On the Pragmatic Basis of Accepting an
Appeal to Authority as Rational
Jean Goodwin, Dealing With Propositions: A Reply to Rühl

49. Bruce Russell, Good Arguments and Fallacies
Richard Feldman, Comments on Bruce Russell

50. Marie J. Secor, Mill's Fallacies: Theory and Practice
Raymie McKerrow, Mill's Treatment of Fallacies: A Response to Secor's Analysis

51. Christina Slade, From a Critical Point of View: News as Soap Opera
Deborah Berrill, Comments on Christina Slade

52 A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Verbal Indicators of Argumentation and
Explanation
J. Anthony Blair, Comments on A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

53. Lawrence G. Souder, A Way to Describe and Evaluate Thought Experiments, or Trying to Get a Grip on Virtual Reality
Daniel H. Cohen, What Would Happen if I Did a Thought Experiment Alone in the
Woods and No One was There to Respond?

54. Christopher Thomson, On 'Burdens' of Proof in Ordinary Language Argumentation
Fred Kauffeld, Comments on Christopher M. Thomson

55. Mark Vorobej, Fallacies on Film
David Birdsell, Response to Mark Vorobej

56. John Woods, The Normative Impotence of Ideal Models
Robert C. Pinto, Comments on John Woods

57. Robert J. Yanal, Argument and Conviction
Robert W. Binkley, Comments on Robert J. Yanal